About Us News New Products Guestbook Contact Us Home   
NO. 1
Name Sofia_Arizona Date: 2012-02-09 15:23:39
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.
↑TOP

NO. 2
Name Stella_Illinois Date: 2012-02-09 14:55:29
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.
↑TOP

NO. 3
Name Rachel_Illinois Date: 2012-02-09 14:08:38
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.
↑TOP

NO. 4
Name Allison_Tennessee Date: 2012-02-09 13:43:02
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.
↑TOP

NO. 5
Name Layla_Illinois Date: 2012-02-09 12:45:11
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.
↑TOP

Next Page4   Last Page:   Select: Pages:1 / 5 Total 21 counts